Street Banking

Here in China, company’s cafeteria serve three meals a day at very reasonable prices. Since other options are not really more attractive, it becomes a popular dinner solution. Employees usually leave work around 8pm after the meal. On this day, I strolled among them toward my hotel, a casual ten-minute walk, enjoying the winding down at the end of the day. It was already dark and I noticed a line of battery-powered lights along the sidewalk several paces ahead. I expected vendors pedaling toys, gadgets, cheap jewelries, DVDs, or whatever.

As I got close, I found it slightly unusual. The ones behind the table, tending the walkers-by, were young and dressed in suits. Those tables displayed pamphlets and forms, not cheap merchandises. There were people sitting on foot stools filling up forms. The business appeared to be good and my curiosity was aroused.

They were banks. On those cheap propped up tables were laptops powered by a far-away portable generator, which also powered the lights. A USB dongle provided the 3G broad-band connection to the Internet. Clients would sign up credit cards, mutual fund accounts, or other financial services right on the street.

Several paces down the road, there were another cluster of short-tables and stools. The same customers who just applied for a new credit card were probably here getting a bowl of spicy hot-pot (麻辣烫) on-the-go. The tables were about knee-high so the stools were for semi-squatting posture. The lighting was barely sufficient to make out the foods. The patrons were oblivious to the brisk pedestrians and car traffic not more than 5 feet away.

I imagined myself sitting down on one of those tables and shouted out, “One beer, a skewer of fish balls, beef noodles, and two Visa credit card application forms here.” I was amused by the thought, but kept on walking.

Posted in China, Witness to my life | 3 Comments

Clinton on Google

Hillary Rodham Clinton stood by Google on its case against China. “Censorship should not be in any way accepted by any company from anywhere,” Mrs. Clinton said. “American companies need to take a principled stand. This needs to be part of our national brand.”

She did not mention that the US government routinely monitor the Web and bring the force of the laws and the ire of the government upon those whom they deemed illegal or threatening to the national security. USA is not alone. All countries disallow certain communications, Internet or not, with legal, political, or administrative means. The citizens usually has three choices: obey the laws by not communcating those topics, do so anyway and risk getting prosecuted, or move to another country that permits them.

Countries mostly agreed that IP theft, child pornography, and terrorism should be banned. Other topics, such as file sharing, privacy, and political viewpoints are of much debate. The general protocol frowns upon imposing one’s values on others. Without this respect for basic sovereignty, countries could only resort to force, usually not pleasant.

Sen. Clinton also said, “Countries or individuals that engage in cyber-attacks should face consequences and international condemnation.” We now have sufficient evidence that the attacks on Google, Apple, Yahoo, and other US companies were well organized, well funded, and sophisticated. They were the act of professionals (the best of them are NSA and CIA, two US government agencies). It is quite rare that those professional leave traces, let alone get caught. Clinton implied that China government initiated those attacks. Did she mean to unleash NSA or CIA upon China as part of those “consequences and condemnation?” Meet evil with evil, an eye for an eye?

Posted in China, Peek into my mind | Leave a comment

A Fine Day at Hong Kong

The best things to do in Hong Kong are shopping and eating, no fun without a company. When I learned that I would have a weekend free, we arranged to stay with an old friend and she was a great host and tour guide.

Tai Ping Shan (太平山), overlooking downtown, is prime residential area. Rent average is about 5 to 10 times higher than ShangHai or ShenZhen. The city built a long and winding escalator chain (中環扶梯) cascading to about mid-level, along side the old punishing stairs. The escalators are all one-way. They go downhill before 10am and switch to uphill for the rest of the day. There are hundreds of bars and western restaurants along this winding path: pubs, Spanish, Mexican, burger joints, etc. I could breakfast, lunch, dinner, and drink here for a whole month without getting bored.

IFC (International Finance Center) is really a huge mall. In addition to the normal variety of stores, there are also several nice restaurants. Shoppers do not come to Hong Kong for bargains anymore. Instead, this island offers probably the store and selection density. Within a city block, it has unbelievable number of stores selling unbelievable number of goods. All accepting your credit cards with impeccable smiles. It is pleasant to shop here, just wear comfortable shoes and also bring a porter to carry the bags.

Ice House Street (雪廠街) has several historical gems. There are four street lamps, still burning gas, at the corner of a lovely flight of stairs. Half way up is a Starbucks (yes, sorry) in a historical Ice House (冰室 Bing Sutt). Old pictures and posters on the wall give this chain store some unique personalities. The coffee, of course, tasted exactly the same.

Our host brought us to an authentic tea restaurant (茶餐厅): neighborhood diners that serve comfort foods. These pragmatic establishments focus on speed and high-quality ingredients, instead of decor or services. They fill a gap in Hong Kong’s over-populated life; no one has a decent kitchen or time to cook. These tea restaurants feed Hong Kong, cheaply and quickly. The menu reflects Hong Kong’s melting pot culture. We saw spaghetti in Chinese broth. Noodles with sides of sunny-side up eggs and toasts.

In the morning, we bid farewell to the friend and boarded the ferry back to ShenZhen. I am probably 5 pounds heavier from all those decadent indulgences. No regrets. So nice to have an old friend in Hong Kong.

Posted in China, Tour guides | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Becoming Human

Becoming Human

http://www.becominghuman.org/

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/beta/evolution/


PBS recently aired this 3-part series of human evolution. The style and structure are like other PBS documentary/educational programs: a narrator with impeccable voice, interviews with impressive experts, and revelations of break-through knowledge. This subject, human evolution, is of interest, so I watched, yes, all three episodes.

We knew that apes became bipeds (primates that walk with two hind legs), then became human. My surprise was that there were many kinds of bipeds that had the advantage of walking more efficiently and seeing farther away. Bipeds, therefore, can hunt in the prairie; unlike their 4-legged cousins that can only gather in the forests. If there were many bipeds, how come there is only one human being now?

Then Africa went through a period of drastic weather changes: drought, flood, and back to drought, repeated many times over several thousand years. Those weather cycles eliminated those bipeds that cannot adopt and only Homo Erectus survived. They have larger brains and adapt better. Homo Erectus migrated from Africa to Europe and pretty much the whole world. They had less hair for more efficient heat disipation over the long distance. They could chase fury animals until the prey became too hot to move. After the kill, their two-legged efficiency enabled them to carry the carcasses back home. The hairlessness and walking capacity were unique advantage for day time huntng. When the sun sets, they built fire to fend off predators. That created communication and social skills. But we are not Homo Erectus, we are Homo Sapiens. Home Erectus went extinct too.

When Africa became desert, Homo Erectus couldn’t survive. Only less than few hundreds went to the coast side and learned to fish. They became smaller (more energy efficient) and even smarter. Several thousand years later, they became Homo Sapiens. In the mean time, those Homo Eractus dominated the rest of the world: Europe, Asia, etc.

Gradually, Homo Sapiens wandered off Africa in search for better food sources. Somehow, when they encountered Homo Erectus, their genetic cousin vanished. They consumed the same foods and therefore are natural rivalries. Homo Sapiens became the dominant resident of this planet some 200,000 years ago.

The most interesting fact is that others have dominated the world for far, far longer time: bipeds and Homo Erectus all survived over 500,000 years. History predicts that Homo Sapiens’ domination will be of limited time. One day, Homo Sapiens will exist only in fossil form.

I will, of course, be long dead. I wonder what would they think when they found the fossil that was me.

Posted in Books & Reviews, Peek into my mind | 2 Comments

水滸: 悽涼結局

其實我忘了水滸的結局了. 小時候看到招安,就義憤填噟,摔書不看了. 這次耐性的一回回的聽完了. 中國的四大小說,設計都是說書的型式. iPod,正好提供聽書的環境.

戰死沙場的也就罷了,船伙張橫的英魂,武松的左手,都令人嘆息. 但那是打戰的代價. 方臘那邊,不也死了許多嗎? 平方臘後,水滸散將,一個個走了. 李俊赴船出海. 武松出家. 燕青也消遙而去. 這些都能令人暗嘆佩服. 但宋江,盧俊義被奸黨毒害,沒得好死. 是不是施耐庵暗示宋江的領導錯誤? 只是陪上了李逵,花榮,當了副將.

最悽涼的是吳用. 他雖無武功,但在梁山,征南,宋江給了他舞台. 從此只是一介文人,滿腹雄韜,沒有發揮的可能. 那就罷了. 現在連能說話的朋友都沒了. 於是鬱悶到了無生趣,自盡忠義堂.

水滸悲劇,給人最大的感嘆,是英雄慘死,奸黨得勝. 讀者及聽眾的不平,也就是水滸流傳不衰的重點原因了.

這是我重讀四大小說的第一本. 老實說,我紅樓從來沒看完過,也不會去看了. 但三國西遊,現在十分嚮往開讀哦.

Posted in Books & Reviews, China | Tagged | Leave a comment

Loma Prieta memory

Yes. That was a jolt, I stood up quickly, walked to the office door, and waited.

Earthquake Center: A light earthquake occurred at 10:09:35 AM (PST) on Thursday, January 7, 2010.
The magnitude 4.1 event occurred 11 km (7 miles) ENE (58 degrees) of Milpitas, CA.
The hypocentral depth is 11 km ( 7 miles).

An office neighbor exchanged a glance with me. Yep, we understood what’s going on and were both waiting. About 10 seconds passed and we went back to our seats without a word. Loma Prieta was October of 1989 and the memory was fresh as yesterday. That day, I fought four hours of impossible traffic to get home. My very pregnant wife, her mother, and a young daughter, were sitting in the front yard, with candle lights, chatting and waiting for me. I was so happy to see them and joined their snack party immediately. There were some broken dishes. Electricity came back late that night. TV tumbled but still worked.

Life in California.

Posted in Witness to my life | Tagged | 1 Comment

It’s about productivity, Dr. Krugman

Many economists believe that the US will have a short-lived recovery and head right back to recession once the stimulus money runs out. They think the “multiplier” effect of the stimulus is about one, or even a bit less. This means the stimulus wouldn’t have lasting effects on the economy. When the spigot turns off, the economy will snap back to where it was, or even overshoots to a worse state. The US needs a longer-term and sustainable solution.

The attention turns outward to China. They don’t play fair. They dumped goods on us. They subsidized with artificial exchange rate. They are stealing our jobs. Even prominent economists, such as Paul Krugman, are considering protectionism. All these are still short-term thinking.

This matter is classically about basic productivity (value of output divided by costs). If Chinese productivity is higher than Americans – by producing more with the same or the same with less – then they will continue to win. The productivities can equalize by increasing the costs on the Chinese side or the productivity on the American side. (It is not interesting to entertain the concepts of decreasing the Chinese output, per capita, or American’s costs.) I am quite certain that costs on the Chinese side will steadily rise, since all of them want richer lifestyle for themselves and their offspring. But how do you increase the productivity for Americans, or any society?

There are really only three ways to do it: introduce new technologies, build infrastructure, and educate the people. (There used to be the fourth way: exploit natural resources by extracting what’s in the dirt below you or having interesting geographic control points. Most of them have been fully exploited by now.) We observed China spending almost its entire stimulus package on those areas. As far as I can tell, the US spent practically none (half went to banks, the other half ? I have no clue.)

Protectionism will not increase American’s productivity. It adds costs to Chinese side artificially. It works only for the short-term, since refusing lower-costs goods is an invisible tax to the whole society. I do believe America need some short-term relieves, but doing nothing for the long-term is, well, short-sighted.

Posted in Peek into my mind | Leave a comment

A bit too long…

Avatar

James Cameron


We all went to the bathroom before the movie started and stayed away from any liquid during the entire show. That was a good plan.

We came out of the theater with different opinions. She shrugged, “It’s OK.” I thought it was just slightly shy of Star Trek, the best movie of 2009.

James Cameron pushed computer animation to a new level. The visual effects would be worth a ticket or two already. The facial expressions, sceneries, animals, plants, integration of real and animinated characters were all perfectly done. In fact, I felt Jack Sully was dull as a real character than his avatar.

The plot was quite simple and not something to linger over. The conflict was simplistic. The villain was thinly developed and stereotyped. So was the “suit” character; of course he has to be shallow, but not flat.

Pandora was magical. It is really the the main character: the mysteryy gradually unveiled, relationships developed, and the main characters impossibly trapped, torn, and changed. The flying scene was a cool moment. It reminded me a famous Kung Fu fiction in which the main characters rode a pair of large birds together. The bonding was so nicely magical.

A computer graphicist commented that in a couple of years, the effects will wear off and people will realize it is just a so-so movie. Guess there is no point arguing a prediction, since time will have the final say. I think you will enjoy it no matter what. Just go to the bathroom before it starts.

Posted in Books & Reviews | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Resolution

This entry is about new year’s resolutions, particularly the one I made for 2008. Like many of you, I resolved to exercise more. Specifically, I set the goal to work out three times a week. Also like many of you, I failed.

I started exercising seriously in 2000. Family made a plan to visit Washington, D.C. and that worried me. Everyday I came home exhausted; I would take a nap before supper. Could I walk 4 to 6 hours a day for several days? To test, I tried to run and couldn’t even finish a lap. That scared me. So I started running and gradually increased the distance. By the time we took the trip, several months later, I could finish a mile (four laps).

A couple of years later, family planned for Grand Canyon. A friend recommended the mule ride and I wanted to do it. But there is a 190 pounds weight limit, fully dressed. I was, eh, over the limit. Motivated, I notched up my running and watched my diet. On the day of the weigh-in — finishing three miles by then — I triumphantly passed. (I think I was really 191, but they just waved me through.) The memory of the ride would last a lifetime, so would the effect of the weight lost and exercising. I like the “lightness” feeling and the extra energy. So, instead of exercising for a project (D.C. trip, Grand Canyon, etc.), I adopted it into my lifestyle. As a nerd, I also started record those activities into a spreadsheet. (If you read this Scott, high-five.) A “work-out” is a cadio-vascular aerobic activity that produces sufficent perspiration and lasts at least 15 minutes.

In social setting, my standard answer to the question “so, how many times you work out each week?” has always been, “about 3 times.” The spreadsheet would prove that a lie. In 2008, I made a resolution to make it real and had an iron-clad plan. I would work out every other day. The arithmetic was solid. It cannot fail.

Wrong! I was weak-minded. There were raining days, sick days, busy days, traveling days, hot days, cold days, vacation days, and plain old lazy days. That “every other day” regiment ended 2008 with 123 work-outs, or a pathetic 2.37 times a week on average.

When 2008 ended, I renewed my resolution for 2009. I would work out everyday. Yes. I would head for the gym, or hit the pavement, if there is an hour of break in a day. I don’t reschedule meetings, I don’t skip social activities, I make time for family and friends, I don’t run in the dark, I don’t force it if I am sick. With this new strategy, I have managed 156 times, just enough to claim three times a week. Whew!

The conclusion? Weak-minded people need to aim higher.

Posted in Witness to my life | 2 Comments

初到深圳

初看深圳,感觉和北京上海没什么不同,一样的大街,靓丽的大楼,购物中心有国际级的奢华品牌。说起来,和东京,纽约,旧金山,洛杉矶也没什么不同。高挡公寓冲天而立,遥望城景海水。旧住家区,像旧金山的中国城:矮楼,小店,邻居。但深圳气候温暖,多了许多青青大树。深圳君悦(Grand Hyatt) 今年底开张,肯定了它的商业重要性。 深圳的“关外”,是指经济特区的分界点。香港回归后,这“关”只是虚设的个历史结构罢了。但关外比较不繁华,治安也差些。龙岗区的坂田村,几年前是农地。今天已是个新兴的边缘城市。看来是个炒楼的战略地点。

遥望香港,真是此一时彼一时,回归前和今天,天壤之别。深圳边现在一样繁华,只是空间多了太太多。朋友住在海边的高楼,能收到香港的手机和电视讯号。有通行证的深圳人,十五分钟能到中环购物,人民币一样好使。香港居民也几乎可以自由来去。想想为什么要忍受五倍以上的房价挤在香港呢?

深圳市基本上都是外地人,文化上不能说是广东。看看餐馆,比比都是川湘菜,粤菜还少些。特别找了几家粤菜馆子,口味也一般。可能香港的粤菜还正宗地道。不是说深圳的餐馆不好,其实档次颇高的,环境,口味,服务都不输上海北京。只是没有传统本地菜。

大概因为不是个观光城,没有看到北京的秀水街,上海的襄阳市场这种外销卖点。倒是高挡超市不少。也有好几个高挡消费区,看电影,购物,吃饭,喝茶聊天,区内走走就到。问了几个深圳人休闲做什么,都答不出来。想来没有什么休闲的观念。工余就是休息罢了。这是个今天在忙着赚钱的城市,慢慢他也会走出自己的文化出来的。

Posted in China, Witness to my life | Tagged | 1 Comment