Sinners casting stones

Copenhagen Climate Summit was really the show for two countries: the USA and China, the biggest two polluters in this world. It came down to a simple struggle: each wanted the other to emit less CO2 than they would like.

The math is quite simple. Chinese outnumber Americans four to one. If Chinese would enjoy the carbon-heavy American lifestyle, China would emit a lot more CO2 than today. If that happens, that would force American to change their current lifestyle, something Americans would kill to avoid. Can he is with sin cast a stone?

But, argued Americans, all we want is to maintain status quo. Everyone freezes at their current carbon emission level until we, advanced technological countries, figure out how to solve this problem.

Did anyone buy that? Did any American buy that?

Posted in Peek into my mind | 3 Comments

Quite Inconvenient

Let’s go with the premise that Earth is warming to the detriment of human societies. Let’s further accept that human activities, producing various greenhouse gases, etc., caused this. There are then three possible courses of action: do nothing (always an option), change our behavior, or engineer our way out of it. (The obvious fourth possibility — run away to another habitat — is not yet feasible.)

A large part of us are doing exactly nothing. We kept on driving SUVs, eating beef, turning up heat, drinking bottle water, etc. Why or how can this be changed are not the topic here. It is factual.

Some of us, called socialists here, are changing our behavior: turning off lights, buying green products, urging friends to follow-suit, or shouting at corporations and countries to behave responsibly. The iconoclastic Mr. Al Gore won a Nobel prize doing so.

Strangely, the third group, geo-engineers, is clashing with the second. I had a science-fictional idea and others will like to pump sulfur dioxide into the high atmosphere with a long garden hose. Should human beings be allowed to engineer themselves out of this? Al Gore, and his fellow socialists, insisted that social behavior change is the only solution. We human engineered ourselves into this. If allowed, we will inevitably make a bigger mess that will lead to perish. Gosh, one group proposed sending millions of reflectors into the orbit to reflect away Sun light. Stop those crazy scientists and engineers. Just change your behavior and the world will nurse itself back.

Homo Sapiens survived these 200,000 years of existence by altering the world to suit themselves. Many parts of this world have been changed beyond recognition or even uninhabitable. But admit it, we would rather kill each others than change our ways of life.

Let’s unroll the garden hose. It costs less than the stimulus package, much less.

Posted in Peek into my mind | Leave a comment

Saving Dolphins

The Cove

2009


Documentaries are so annoying. They disrupt my normal, ignorant, and blissful life. Now I think of this cause and must deal with the emotions that this film provoked: sadness, anger, and this thing that pinches your heart when you think of it. That’s why I usually skipped this genre and opted for mindless comedy or action films.

Of course there were villains, powerful and evil ones, to fight. In this case they were the fishermen in Taiji and Japanese government personified by their representative to IWF (International Whaling Federation), an UN-recognized organization.

I was appalled by the unnecessary brutality toward an adorable and apparently intelligent species. But let’s face it. This is not the first, last, or only adorable and intelligent species human brutalizes. Gosh, we actually brutalize our fellow human beings on daily basis, in means no less appalling than those Taiji fishermen do to those dolphins.

There is, of course, no justification to tolerate any brutality. But reality forces us to prioritize our resources, or simply the reservoir of our emotions. Should I add Taiji brutality to the causes that I have already carried: global warming, hunger, education, pet rescue, economic policies, Peet’s against Starbucks, etc? How much an activist can one expect out of a normal and ignorant member of the society who really wants just bliss?

That’s why documentaries do not sell well. I hope that Ric O’Barry has stopped those Taiji fishermen. I am also certain seaquariums are not closing anytime soon, although I may not visit any of them again. In the mean time, watch this film next time you peruse video catalogue. It is not bad to feel and think once in a while.

Posted in Books & Reviews | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Performance Enhanced?

If athletes are allowed to compete only with whatever they were born with there will be no Michael Phelps, Tiger Woods, Joe Montana, and your favorite sport star. The ethical question is not whether an athlete can enhance his or her ability artificially, it is whether the enhancement is available and adopted by the public, or their fellow competitors.

Tiger Woods had refractory surgeries, state-of-the-arts equipment, world’s finest training staff, and various machinery that tune his every muscles. Michael Phelp wore this magical suit to make him faster than fish. Joe Montana had back surgeries that actually made him stronger. Were they enhanced artificially? Sure they were, only within the admissible bounds.

Amy Mullins, pictured above, wants to compete with her carbon-fiber legs, so did Oscar Pistorius, below on the right, and several others. If those prosthetic legs gave them unfair advantage, what happens if they grew new legs through miraculous use of stem cells?

Technically, if we can grow limbs back, there was no alternation, only rejuvenation. But if such technology exists, there will be no more career-ending injuries, athletes will than take much higher risk pushing themselves. Would that be fair?

Posted in Peek into my mind | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Earphones

For years, I struggled to sleep on long flights to and from China. With many experiments, I nailed down the ambient noise to be the key culprit. That led to an iPod investment and the quest for a good pair of earphones. (Those white iPod ear-buds were useless.)

High quality earphones come in two categories: noise cancellation or noise isolation. The nose cancellation ones first cover the entire ears, then their fancy electronics produce sounds that are the opposite of the ambient noises. To the wearer, the experience is near miraculous. The best known brand is Bose. The $300 or so price tag did not stop me, but their bulk did. I couldn’t possibly sleep with them on my head, let alone allocate precious hand-carry space to store them.

Eventually, I chose Shure E2C and loved them. They are the noise isolation kind, designed to block noises from entering your ear channels. They are light-weight, small to carry, and offer excellent sound quality. I was happy to pay $250 or so for a pair. When I needed to replace them, I found that Shure renamed their models. While I was hesitating and researching, a professional musical instruments store recommended M-Audio IE30. They are comparable to Shure, only the cable is a bit stiff. I flew in them for a year and have been quite happy with them. Until I upgraded my iPod to Touch.

IPod Touch is full solid-state and suitable for exercising. For that, these high-end earphones are not good: they are too expensive for outdoor sport uses and tend to fall off my ears. I bought a pair of Philips SHS3201 hooks. They worked and I wiped them after jogging, until a friend’s pet cat nibbed on them. Sigh, those wimpy cables were no match to cat gnaw.

Interestingly, Sony MDR-J10 sport earphones project sound front-ward, instead of into the ears. They could have good reasons for this design, but it did not work for me. The sound fades in and out when I jog and the ambient noises further degraded the experience. I found I would rather run without any music than keep on fidgeting with the earphones.

By this time, I have become a reasonable expert in earphones. Here is the summary:

  Price Sound Quality Storage Cable and Fit
Shure E2C, E3C ~$300 Superb Hard case Sturdy and flexible
M-Audio IE30 ~$250 Superb Hard case Sturdy, less flexible
*Philips ~$15 Good None Flimsy, good for outdoor sports
Sony ~$20 OK A pouch Flimsy, good for threadmills

Yes, Philips is the best value by this reviewer.

Posted in Books & Reviews, Witness to my life | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

Stimulating Whom?

Give an entrepreneur some capital. Of course he or she will try to make more money out of it. Infuse the whole society with money. You expect the whole would become more prosperous, since society is nothing but a collection of individuals and they each would all try to make more money.

Wrong!

An individual, with limited extra money, will consume or invest locally and seek relatively short-term paybacks. A corporation would consider wider range of options and longer time horizon. It may choose to make money with capital or people — automate a process with a new machine and let go several employees, for example. When making investment decisions, they will evaluate all ideas and pursue the ones with the highest returns. Given that the stimulus monies are free. High risk investments, if come with potentially higher returns, will be attractive.

And those American corporations have chosen not to invest in the USA.

Does it surprise you that GM put their stimulus money in China? Of course not, China car sales out-pace the rest of the world. It does not take an MBA to figure out where the shareholders want the investments to be. Now, guess where did those big banks put their stimulus money?
The US stimulus pretty much went straight to other countries’ GDPs. That’s why this recovery benefited only corporations but not citizens.

Good thing China is still buying the US’s debts. Keep your fingers crossed.

Posted in Peek into my mind | Leave a comment

eBooks v. Paper

I have been tempted by Kindle since its debut — I read reasonably avidly: books, magazines, and newspapers; I am comfortable with gadgets; I have enough discretionary income; I travel frequently; and I don’t shelf read books (they go into a box in the garage).

Paper touch and ink smell do not particularly appeal to me. But I like doodling on the margin or title page. I was always delighted to re-acquaint thoughts and feeling that were so intimate long time ago.

Recently I re-read a book bought more than 20 years ago. As I finished it, I wondered if any of the eBook format or reader would survive even five. What’s going to happen to my collection when the format changed or the reader broke? Do I care? Really?

I read a fair amount of Chinese books, in both simplified and traditional Chinese. Are they available? I keep several classic around and re-read them all the time. Those are books published several thousand years ago. Would I find them on catalogs? Would I need to pay for them?

On my recent trip, I saw a fellow traveler buried in her Kindle and another in a hardcover The Lost Symbol. I was tempted to strike up a conversation with the book reader (but did not). So the paper version is more a social tool. I am sure the Kindler has been so annoyed by the same line, “So, how do you like the this gadget?” Or other usability inquiries.

My nightstand has my reading list and the queue size is four now. I wouldn’t consider any eReader until I have cleared my paper inventory. In the mean time, I will wait for the price war between Amazon, B&N, and Sony.

Posted in Peek into my mind, Tour guides | Tagged | 4 Comments

SFO to ShenZhen 深圳

The trip to ShenZhen can be non-intuitive and a bit unnatural even for seasoned travelers. The spirit is to treat the ferry as an international connection that you will purchase the ticket after you have arrived Hong Kong airport. You don’t cross Hong Kong custom at all and need to have faith on the efficiency of Hong Kong workers that will magically handle your luggage with very short notices.

  1. Whichever airline, you first manage to arrive at Hong Kong International Airport. The arrival time should be before 8pm. I took the UA flight from SFO, Cathay Pacific seems popular.
  2. As you get off the airplane, search for the sign “Ferries to Mainland/Macau,” do not claim your luggage, do not enter Hong Kong.
  3. The sign should guide you to the E1 transfer area eventually. Proceed to the ferry ticket counter, with your passport and luggage claim ticket, and buy the ferry ticket to ShenZhen’s SheKou (蛇口) pier. Try to give yourself about an hour before the ferry departure time. The ferry runs about once per hour and the last one is at 9pm. The clerk will take your luggage claim tickets, scan them, and give you back the new claim tickets, with the ferry ticket. The fare is HKD220 per person.
  4. With the ferry ticket and your passport in hand, go to the E1 transfer security check and “depart” Hong Kong. After passing the security and climbed the escalator, you should see an elevator on your right. Take the elevator to the L4 level.
  5. At L4 level, find gate 511. About 25 minutes before the ferry departure time, they will board you onto a shuttle bus. It takes about 5 minutes to the pier.
  6. The ride is about 30 minutes and you arrive the SheKou pier, on the ShenZhen side. Get off the ferry and wait for them to unload all the luggage. There is no carousel, just plain old concrete on the pier. Show your claim tickets and proceed to the China custom. Remember to fill out the entry form.
  7. You exit the ferry terminal just like an airport. Your ride should be there. Otherwise, there are plenty of taxies. Welcome to ShenZhen, China.

The return pretty much run the tape in reverse, except for several points to pay a bit attention to. At the Ferry Terminal, some airlines take your luggage directly. You will see them at the end of the journey. For others, like United, the ferry handles only their segment. You will need to claim you luggage at the other end and re-check in at the counter. Either way, you present the ticket and passport to the China border control, go upstair to pass security and get your passport stamped, lastly, arrive at the pier to borad the 30-minute ride.

Arriving Hong Kong, those lucky ones go direclty to the security gates. The rest of us waited for our luggage (you can see the crane taking the luggage pods off the boat one by one). Drag you luggage pretty much go directly to the other side of the room to the airline counters. Check in, get your boarding pass, proceed to security.

When exit the security, stop by to receive your Hong Kong Airport tax refund. Since we never entered Hong Kong, the services were refunded to us. HK$120 in the pocket. I had the implus to donate them to a local cause, but none were around.

Instead of bus, I took the train of two stops. My destination was the second one: terminals 1 to 80. By the time I arrived the gate, nearly 3 hours have passed since I bought the ferry ticket. This means I would book the ferry that is at least 3.5 hours before the flight’s departure time.

Posted in Tour guides, Witness to my life | Tagged , | Leave a comment

2012

2012

John Cusack


Disaster is a well understood and typically formulaic genre. The special effects are the main draw. Audience wants realism: scary scenes that fool the brain into believing. Next the plot must could happen. Lastly, there should be a battle between the bests and worsts of human kind. These elements limit the artistic creativity; the special effects usually dwarf the rest of the budget and leave little for anything else.

2012 is a pretty good movie, considering its genre. If you enjoyed Transformer 2, you should go see this one.

Whether the ancient Mayan prediction of the end is real or not is irrelevant. We saw our world totally destroyed in front of our eyes and cliff-hang with our main characters at every turn of their misfortunes and near escapes from death.

The plot follow the old Noah’s Ark concept and has some ludicrous points: Chinese get to to construct that Arks because of their manufacturing prowess, they drove to Yellowstone, from LA, in a limo, and, lastly, what kind of engine cannot turn on because a stupid door was jammed?

I was impressed that Chinese characters spoke Tibetan, instead of Mandarin. (I cannot evaluate the authenticity.) The special effects seem more impressive in the teasers, but were still good.

Posted in Books & Reviews | Tagged | Leave a comment

水滸: 管理觀念

宋江原來在梁山經營個小公司,生意蒸蒸日上. 但是他覺得前途不好,於是想被併購. 汴涼的徽宗趙佶是他的理想對象. 於是三次協商,簽訂併購合同. 梁山泊的CEO,搖身成為宋朝的個中級主管.

商業併購,十之八九,被併購的主管,在兩年內離開. 文化隔閡太大,管理理念相隔太遠.

宋江原來的假想敵是徽宗. 大公司動作慢,又官僚,其實容易競爭. 他可以在大傘下,打下自己一塊江山. 被併購後,他的對象是江南方臘,另一個中小公司. 這下就難些了.

回頭看他如何在大宋中存活呢? 宋江其實沒有大公司的資歷. 那些高俅,蔡京,身居EVP,都是在大公司打滾過來的好手. 宋江以為做事好就能被賞識,其實公司內部的人事關係,比做事實力更重要. 他自己不就是靠李師師,才搞定那併購的嗎? 轉眼,他就忘了要下工夫聯絡好高俅和蔡京,只會去打仗. 一下子,梁山的大寨主頭把金交椅,變成了只知服從,不敢抗命的大宋奴才.

宋江要是自己繼續經營梁山公司,能打下足夠的市場,與宋朝分庭抗禮嗎? 其實還有另一個大公司,金朝,也在這市場競爭. 宋江如果局勢分析好了,應該知道和宋朝併購,不如在方臘,宋,金三面經營. 也許梁山能左右世局呢?

讀史,即使是小說,也真有用.

Posted in Books & Reviews, Management Thoughts | Tagged | 1 Comment