<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sin-Yaw @ Juniper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr</link>
	<description>The views expressed here are my personal opinions, have not been reviewed or authorized by Juniper Networks and do not necessarily represent the views of Juniper Networks.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Change? by Loud Thoughts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to Change?</title>
		<link>http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/2008/10/how-to-change/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Loud Thoughts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to Change?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/?p=99#comment-36</guid>
		<description>[...] There is the traditional corporate-style change management: get senior executive endorsement, socialize with stakeholders, build early successes, prepare for communication, etc. We are in the era of blurred line between employees and community. New change management must embrace both approaches: the tipping point style and the corporate style. Read more&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is the traditional corporate-style change management: get senior executive endorsement, socialize with stakeholders, build early successes, prepare for communication, etc. We are in the era of blurred line between employees and community. New change management must embrace both approaches: the tipping point style and the corporate style. Read more&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quality Flow by Loud Thoughts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Quality Flow</title>
		<link>http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/2008/10/quality-flow/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Loud Thoughts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Quality Flow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 03:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/?p=88#comment-35</guid>
		<description>[...] What separate professional software development and amateur? The ratio of effort devoted on quality. Amateurs make it work. Professional show evidences. The amount of efforts in professional software houses devoted to quality and verification easily dwarfs standard definition of development effort.&#8217; Read more&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What separate professional software development and amateur? The ratio of effort devoted on quality. Amateurs make it work. Professional show evidences. The amount of efforts in professional software houses devoted to quality and verification easily dwarfs standard definition of development effort.&#8217; Read more&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Change? by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/2008/10/how-to-change/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/?p=99#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Very insightful Sin-Yaw, human change is one of those things that is frequently overlooked as organizational change is contemplated. It is often the last thing discussed and more of an add-on than the centerpiece of getting new technology, methods, and structures adopted at large in an organization.

We'll have to keep this at front of mind as we move forward on a few of our projects.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very insightful Sin-Yaw, human change is one of those things that is frequently overlooked as organizational change is contemplated. It is often the last thing discussed and more of an add-on than the centerpiece of getting new technology, methods, and structures adopted at large in an organization.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll have to keep this at front of mind as we move forward on a few of our projects&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Economy of Green by Stacey Derbinshire</title>
		<link>http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/2008/10/the-economy-of-green/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Derbinshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/?p=96#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Great post. I will read your posts frequently. Added you to the RSS reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I will read your posts frequently. Added you to the RSS reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 100 Days by Loud Thoughts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 100 Days</title>
		<link>http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/2008/10/100-days/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Loud Thoughts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 100 Days</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/?p=84#comment-32</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quality Flow by gwynne stoddart</title>
		<link>http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/2008/10/quality-flow/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>gwynne stoddart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/?p=88#comment-31</guid>
		<description>May I offer an observation.... there's a gem at the  
beginning...people actually spending quality time *looking* at code...rather than the indirect effects of the code...

"The verification takes place in phases. First is the effort to make  
sure the software works as designed. This is most commonly done by the  
same person who designs the software, but more effective if by someone  
who sits close to him/her and watches over his/her shoulders as he/she  
codes. The goal is to make sure the software behaves well for all  
ranges of inputs."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I offer an observation&#8230;. there&#8217;s a gem at the<br />
beginning&#8230;people actually spending quality time *looking* at code&#8230;rather than the indirect effects of the code&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;The verification takes place in phases. First is the effort to make<br />
sure the software works as designed. This is most commonly done by the<br />
same person who designs the software, but more effective if by someone<br />
who sits close to him/her and watches over his/her shoulders as he/she<br />
codes. The goal is to make sure the software behaves well for all<br />
ranges of inputs.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Power of One by Sin-Yaw Wang</title>
		<link>http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/2008/09/the-power-of-one/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Sin-Yaw Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/?p=71#comment-30</guid>
		<description>One Windows has given Microsoft a nice run.  One Linux has conquered half of the world.  One OS from Juniper can bring out more products more quickly than Cisco, actually at lower price too.

I am not sure Cisco is growing faster than Juniper.  Check out their revenue trends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One Windows has given Microsoft a nice run.  One Linux has conquered half of the world.  One OS from Juniper can bring out more products more quickly than Cisco, actually at lower price too.</p>
<p>I am not sure Cisco is growing faster than Juniper.  Check out their revenue trends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Power of One by strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/2008/09/the-power-of-one/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/?p=71#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Ah, a single OS, central development, singular interface... No doubt you will beat Cisco on the products you choose to compete with... However, what's the strategy for growth?  By doing the same products better and taking market shares away?

A dis-centralized Cisco with big appetite for acquisition, is after new markets with new products quickly.  Can you keep up with their growth?  A large competitor like Cisco that grows at faster pace, is bad news for Juniper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, a single OS, central development, singular interface&#8230; No doubt you will beat Cisco on the products you choose to compete with&#8230; However, what&#8217;s the strategy for growth?  By doing the same products better and taking market shares away?</p>
<p>A dis-centralized Cisco with big appetite for acquisition, is after new markets with new products quickly.  Can you keep up with their growth?  A large competitor like Cisco that grows at faster pace, is bad news for Juniper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Route 26 by Sin-Yaw Wang</title>
		<link>http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/2008/09/route-26/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Sin-Yaw Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/?p=74#comment-28</guid>
		<description>fixed time line</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fixed time line</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Route 26 by short hair rolls</title>
		<link>http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/2008/09/route-26/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>short hair rolls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomadicminds.org/jnpr/?p=74#comment-27</guid>
		<description>that is what I did after left Sun, riding bike and taking light rail to work. what I intend to do, is to put my $$ for gas into public transportation's pocket, NOT oil companies. I have my own iphone, so riding the light rail is not boring at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is what I did after left Sun, riding bike and taking light rail to work. what I intend to do, is to put my $$ for gas into public transportation&#8217;s pocket, NOT oil companies. I have my own iphone, so riding the light rail is not boring at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
